User Group for Laser Interference Biometry
|
ULIB User Group for Laser Interference Biometry |
|
(*): calculated from A-SRKT using relations from here.
Optimized IOL Constants for the ZEISS IOLMaster reported by ULIB members
or other sources (as of Jul 30, 2010):
(Please note: constants are preliminary, especially if n < 50 !
For details how to create your own tentative constants, please click
here).
Constants are given without any legal responsibility !
IOL nominal Haigis HofferQ Holl.1 SRK/T SRK II n Ref. Acrimed Acriflex 42CSE A=118.5 pACD=5.72 sf=1.96 A=119.2 A=119.7 49 [12] Alcon AcrySof MA30BA A=118.9 a0=1.50 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.68 sf=1.89 A=119.1 A=119.3 135 [3] Alcon AcrySof MA60AC A=118.4 a0=1.49 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.82 sf=2.02 A=119.2 A=119.8 14 [8] Alcon SA30AL A=118.4 a0=1.29 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.45 sf=1.65 A=118.7 A=118.9 515 [3] Alcon SA30AL A=118.4 a0=1.38 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 sf=1.62 25 [1] Alcon SA60AT A=118.4 pACD=5.18 sf=1.43 A=118.4 [1] Alcon SN60WF A=118.4 a0=0.529 a1=0.107 a2=0.172 pACD=5.50 sf=1.74 A=118.9 Haigis: 327; other: 450 [13] Alcon ReStor MN6AD1 pACD=5.69 sf=1.93 A=119.25 
[21] AMO SI40 NB A=118.0 a0=1.18 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.34 sf=1.51 A=118.5 A=118.6 329 [3] AMO SI30 NB A=117.4 a0=1.03 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.51 sf=1.60 A=118.6 A=118.5 33 [4] AMO Tecnis Z9000 A=119.0 pACD=5.54 sf=1.81 A=119.1 A=119.6 27 [9] AMO Tecnis ZM001 A=119.1 A=119.7 20 [14] AMO AR40E JAPAN A=118.4 pACD=5.16 sf=1.33 A=118.1 A=118.2 184 [18] AMO ZA9003 JAPAN A=119.1 pACD=5.28 sf=1.44 A=118.3 A=118.4 160 [18] Bausch & Lomb BL 27 A=117.8 a0=1.15 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.09 sf=1.35 A=118.3 A=118.6 37 [7] Bausch & Lomb Hydroview H60M A=118.3 a0=1.46 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.51 sf=1.71 A=118.8 A=119.1 45 [7] Bausch & Lomb LI61U Soflex A=118.0 a0= -0.524 a1=0.009 a2=0.217 pACD=5.20 sf=1.45 A=118.4 195 [11] Corneal BR110 A=118.5 a0=1.25 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.48 sf=1.65 A=118.7 A=119.0 40 [2] Corneal BR100 A=118.5 a0=1.08 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.27 sf=1.44 A=118.4 A=118.4 31 [8] Domilens Silens6 A=118.1 a0=1.06 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.29 sf=1.45 A=118.3 A=118.7 17 [8] Dr.Schmidt MC575 A=119.0 a0=1.67 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.91 sf=2.16 A=119.3 A=120.0 13 [8] OPHTHACryl A70UV A=118.2 a0=1.16 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.31 sf=1.50 A=118.6 A=118.9 27 [8] Hoya FY60AD JAPAN A=118.4 pACD=5.18 sf=1.36 A=118.2 A=118.4 59 [17] Hoya UV60SB JAPAN pACD=4.63 sf=0.79 A=117.3 A=117.4 33 [18] MIRA SMART (SIFI) A=118.0 a0=1.95 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=6.08 sf=2.35 A=119.9 A=120.5 17 [19] MIRA 3 (SIFI) A=118.6 a0=1.73 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.92 sf=2.12 A=119.4 A=120.1 20 [19] Rayner Centerflex 570H A=118.0 A=118.3 A=118.6 50 [10] Rayner C-flex (570C) a0= -1.670 a1=0.368 a2=0.232 pACD=5.49 sf=1.73 A=118.9 [16] Rayner Superflex (620H) a0= -1.670 a1=0.368 a2=0.232 pACD=5.49 sf=1.73 A=118.9 [16] Rayner C-flex Aspheric (970C) a0= -1.670 a1=0.368 a2=0.232 pACD=5.55 sf=1.79 A=119.0 [16] Rayner Superflex Aspheric (920H) a0= -1.670 a1=0.368 a2=0.232 pACD=5.55 sf=1.79 A=119.0 [16] Rayner T-flex (623T & 573T) a0= -1.670 a1=0.368 a2=0.232 pACD=5.49 sf=1.73 A=118.9 [16] Rayner M-flex (630F & 580F) a0= -1.680 a1=0.349 a2=0.227 pACD=5.32 sf=1.56 A=118.6 [16] Rayner M-flex T (638F & 588F) a0= -1.680 a1=0.349 a2=0.227 pACD=5.32 sf=1.56 A=118.6 [16] Staar AQ 2010V A=118.5 a0=1.46 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.61 sf=1.82 A=119.0 A=119.2 203 [3] Lenstec Softec a0=0.92 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 (*) pACD=5.29 sf=1.48 A=118.4 A=118.5 384 [20] Lenstec Tetraflex a0=1.02 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 (*) pACD=5.32 sf=1.54 A=118.6 A=118.7 592 [20] Zeiss Acri.Lyc 44S A=118.0 a0=0.85 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.07 sf=1.29 A=118.3 A=118.5 [6] Zeiss Acri.Lyc 53N A=118.0 a0=0.85 a1=0.40 a2=0.10 pACD=5.07 sf=1.29 A=118.3 A=118.5 [5] Zeiss XL Stabi A=118.0 pACD=5.34 sf=1.54 A=118.6 A=118.8 44 [15] Zeiss XL Octo A=117.9 pACD=5.20 sf=1.43 A=118.4 A=118.6 26 [15]
[1]: personal communication: Warren E.Hill MD FACS East Valley Ophthalmology,Mesa, Arizona, Oct 2001
[2]: IOLMaster optimization results by P.Hoffmann (Castrop-Rauxel, Germany), November 2000
[3]: personal communication and/or based on data by Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C., Decatur, GA, USA
[4]: personal communication: Jorge L.Buonsanti MD, Argentina
[5]: based on official information released by Acri.Tec GmbH, München, Germany, June 19, 2002
[6]: based on official information released by Acri.Tec GmbH, München, Germany, June 22, 2002
[7]: personal communication: Ann Haustermans MD (Brasschaat, Belgium), February 2003
[8]: personal communciation: Prof.Dr.R.Täumer (Frankfurt, Germany), March 2003
[9]: personal communication: Prof.Dr.U.Mester (Sulzbach, Germany), June 2003
[10]: personal communication: Dr.E.M.Lodzik, Marburg, Germany, March 2004
[11]: personal communication: Dr.Jeffrey Sher, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
[12]: based on data by Acrimed GmbH, Berlin, July 2004
[13]: personal communication: Warren E.Hill, MD FACS, East Valley Ophthalmology, Mesa, Arizona, June 2005
[14]: personal communication: Dr.A.Gültekin, Essen, Germany, April 2005
[15]: personal communication: Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Feb. 2008
[16]: personal communication: Rayner Intraocular Lenses Ltd, May 2009
[17]: personal communication; Dr.A.Kawahara, Asahikawa, Japan, June 2009
[18]: personal communication; Dr.G.Yoshida, Chiba, Japan, June 2009
[19]: personal communication; Dr.A.Dmitriew, Poznan, Poland, June/July 2009
[20]: data by Dr.D.Sanders; USA, June 2009
[21]: data by Warren E.Hill MD FACS East Valley Ophthalmology, Mesa, Arizona,July 2010
To calculate missing constants for the other IOL formulas, please use the
conversion formulas described here.
ULIB Homepage
Last Revision: Jul 30, 2009 WH